投中國國民黨就是自我閹割林保華呼籲台灣人不做太監

台灣人真奇怪.  他們票選中國國民黨的總統和立法委員來永遠剝奪台灣人的公投權及公平的司法人權.

台灣人拒做太監！ ◎林保華

列印      Facebook    Twitter  與朋友分享

中國老百姓對台灣的大選有何感想？一位中國網友在看了台灣總統辯論後說：「像是太監看春宮圖，興奮，卻無奈。」這句名言，被廣泛引用，包括香港的《爭鳴》、《亞洲周刊》等雜誌。這是台灣民主的成果，台灣只要保住這個成果，就會感染中國人，促使中國改變。 遺憾的是，馬英九對中國只談統一，不談民主；發動他影響下的媒體與司法等政府機構介入大選，嚴重傷害了台灣的民主成果，顯現威權幽靈的回潮。尤其司 法的表現最為囂張，一刀刀切割其獨立性，不但針對綠營人士，也恐嚇金馬集團以外的藍營人士，例如最近披露出來的張碩文、傅＊（左山右昆）萁及他們的家人。 因此這場台灣大選，是台灣人是不是做太監的選舉。馬英九願意做共產黨的太監，我們沒有意見，但是台灣人絕對不願意做馬英九這個台灣太監總管旗下的太 監。香港已經被綁到「刑場」正在施刑；台灣則正在被綁，只有蔡英文當選、綠營立委過半，台灣才可能擺脫被綑綁閹割的命運。而這個綑綁的繩索，叫做「九二共 識」；中國不但自己，還通過馬英九強迫蔡英文接受這個繩索，也動員台商搖旗吶喊。但是我相信，聰明的台商自己明白，如果台灣人成為共產黨的太監，他們也將 失去統戰的優待而淪為太監。 馬英九當選，不但是台灣人淪為太監的問題。我們看看五都選舉時，連勝文槍擊案扭轉選情後，國民黨的當選人立即舊病復發：胡志強不肯向台中縣民謝票， 以回敬他在台中縣的失利，然而他連支持他的選民也不謝，顯然有族群意識與階級意識作怪。郝龍斌則忙著出國「考察」，連他的副市長也在紐西蘭因為地震被震出 而曝光，據說也在考察，卻未見有隨行人員。即使朱立倫，作為國民黨「明日之星」，他在新北市的施政成績也排在民進黨施政縣市的後面，遑論郝龍斌的台北市與 胡志強的台中市。而馬英九根本忘記執政，為選舉而不擇手段，包括揮霍民脂民膏，不顧嗷嗷待哺的勞苦大眾；因此能相信他續任的承諾嗎？ 這不但見證五個市縣的「綠色執政，品質保證」，五都選舉時沒有投票給民進黨的選民，更不應該忘記那個槍擊案，因而在這次大選中還民進黨一個公道，還自己一個公道；讓台灣在重生的民進黨領導下，實現台灣大團結、大聯合而展翅飛翔。 台灣人拒做太監，台灣人要有尊嚴的活著。國民黨內有台灣心的政治人物，例如王院長、廖秘書長等，你們沒有口出惡言，挑動台灣的分裂，台灣人民會記住這一點，願大家為保有台灣的尊嚴，共同努力。（作者林保華為資深時事評論員，http://blog.pixnet.net/LingFengComment）

2012-01-14: 除三害, 使台灣變成一個正常的文明國家

第一害: 馬英九

第二害: 所有中國國民黨籍的立法委員

人民用選票消滅了這二害後, 

新總統和國會才能夠幫我們除

第三害: 所有不公不義的司法人員

It is OK to sell Taiwan to save AmericaTaiwanese are sub-humans; how else could they support a man like Ma Ying-Jeou?

To Save Our Economy, Ditch Taiwan
New York Times
Here is one: He should enter into closed-door negotiations with Chinese leaders to write off the $1.14 trillion of American debt currently held by China in exchange for a deal to end American military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan and terminate ...

Is This NYT Op-Ed a Joke? Selling Taiwan to the Bankers of Beijing
The Atlantic
America owes China a lot of money; officials in Beijing are always mad at officials in Washington for selling weapons to Taiwan. Presto! Let's solve both problems at once, writing off the debt in exchange for writing off Taiwan. ...

=====

Today, America has little strategic interest in Taiwan, which is gradually integrating with China economically by investing in and forming joint ventures with mainland Chinese firms. The island’s absorption into mainland China is inevitable. 

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

To Save Our Economy, Ditch Taiwan

By PAUL V. KANE

Published: November 10, 2011

WITH a single bold act, President Obama could correct the country’s course, help assure his re-election, and preserve our children’s future.

He needs to redefine America’s mindset about national security away from the old defense mentality that American power derives predominantly from our military might, rather than from the strength, agility and competitiveness of our economy. He should make it clear that today American jobs and wealth matter more than military prowess.

As Adm. Mike Mullen, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declared last year, “The most significant threat to our national security is our debt.”

There are dozens of initiatives President Obama could undertake to strengthen our economic security. Here is one: He should enter into closed-door negotiations with Chinese leaders to write off the $1.14 trillion of American debt currently held by China in exchange for a deal to end American military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan and terminate the current United States-Taiwan defense arrangement by 2015. 

This would be a most precious prize to the cautious men in Beijing, one they would give dearly to achieve. After all, our relationship with Taiwan, as revised in 1979, is a vestige of the cold war.

Today, America has little strategic interest in Taiwan, which is gradually integrating with China economically by investing in and forming joint ventures with mainland Chinese firms. The island’s absorption into mainland China is inevitable. 

But the status quo is dangerous; if Taiwanese nationalist politicians decided to declare independence or if Beijing’s hawks tired of waiting for integration and moved to take Taiwan by force, America could suddenly be drawn into a multitrillion-dollar war.

There will be “China hawks” who denounce any deal on Taiwan as American capitulation, but their fear of a Red China menacing Asia is anachronistic. Portraying the United States as a democratic Athens threatened by China’s autocratic Sparta makes for sensational imagery, but nothing could be further from reality.

The battle today is between competing balance sheets, and it is fought in board rooms; it is not a geopolitical struggle to militarily or ideologically “dominate” the Pacific.

In fact, China and the United States have interlocking economic interests. China’s greatest military asset is actually the United States Navy, which keeps the sea lanes safe for China’s resources and products to flow freely.

China would want a deal on Taiwan for several reasons. First, Taiwan is Beijing’s unspoken but hard-to-hide top priority for symbolic and strategic reasons; only access to water and energy mean more to Chinese leaders.

Second, a deal would open a clearer path for the gradual, orderly integration of Taiwan into China.

Third, it would undermine hard-line militarists who use the Taiwan issue to stoke nationalist flames, sideline pro-Western technocrats and extract larger military budgets. And finally, it would save China the considerable sums it has been spending on a vast military buildup.

Jeffrey Lewis, an East Asia expert at the Monterey Institute of International Studies, estimated that one-fourth to one-third of China’s defense spending goes to forces in the vicinity of Taiwan — at a cost of $30 billion to $50 billion a year. A deal for the resolution of Taiwan’s status could save China $500 billion in defense spending by 2020 and allow Beijing to break even by 2030, while reducing America’s debt and serving our broader economic interests.

The Chinese leadership would be startled — for a change — if the United States were to adopt such a savvy negotiating posture. Beyond reducing our debt, a Taiwan deal could pressure Beijing to end its political and economic support for pariah states like Iran, North Korea and Syria and to exert a moderating influence over an unstable Pakistan. It would be a game changer.

The deal would eliminate almost 10 percent of our national debt without raising taxes or cutting spending; it would redirect American foreign policy away from dated cold-war-era entanglements and toward our contemporary economic and strategic interests; and it would eliminate the risk of involvement in a costly war with China.

Critics will call this proposal impractical, even absurd. They will say it doesn’t have a prayer of passing Congress, and doesn’t acknowledge political realities. They might be right — today.

But by pursuing this agenda, Mr. Obama would change the calculus and political reality. And Congress should see a deal with China as an opportunity to make itself credible again.

Debt is not in itself bad, when managed, but today’s unsustainable debt will suffocate our economy, our democracy and our children’s futures.

By tackling the issue of Taiwan, Mr. Obama could address much of what ails him today, sending a message of bold foreign policy thinking and fiscal responsibility that would benefit every citizen and be understood by every voter.

Paul V. Kane, a former international security fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School, is a Marine who served in Iraq.
=====

Is This NYT Op-Ed a Joke? Selling Taiwan to the Bankers of Beijing

NOV 11 2011, 3:59 PM ET

My first reaction to today's op-ed in the NYT was that it was some kind of put-on. America owes China a lot of money; officials in Beijing are always mad at officials in Washington for selling weapons to Taiwan. Presto! Let's solve both problems at once, writing off the debt in exchange for writing off Taiwan. I kept waiting for the "but seriously now..." transition to a real proposal, or the paragraph saying, "Obviously this would be crazy, yet it underscores..." But apparently the author, Paul V. Kane, identified as a Marine Corps veteran of Iraq and a former fellow at the Kennedy School at Harvard, really means it.

If you would like to have a detailed explanation why this proposal is lunatic, Joe Weisenthal has conveniently laid one out at Business Insider. His conclusion:

So in short, what Kane is advocating is an abdication of our strategic self-direction in exchange for extinguishing a threat (Chinese holdings of U.S. debt) that doesn't exist.

What's scary is not that this will ever happen -- it won't -- but that the size of the debt is causing people to think loonier and loonier things. Eventually we might do something really dumb.

If you'd rather skip the analysis and just laugh at the idea, you can go straight to -- you guessed it -- our old friends at NMA TV in Taiwan. Here is their quickly produced but predictably outraged and amusing response.



Yes, yes, I am fully aware that "cross-Straits relations" and "the Taiwan question" are deadly serious issues in Beijing, Washington, and Taipei. But in this case comedy comes closer to the truth of things than the "responsible" publication does. And NMA is becoming more and more important as a soft-power asset for Taiwan.

Update: If you'd like a combination of mockery and analysis, you can check out Thomas P.M. Barnett'srecent talk about America's debt to China, and the insanity of discussions like this one in the NYT. Really, couldn't the editors have put a tiny "Onion" logo somewere on this item to show that they knew better? 

中學生應該必修 四書五經 嗎? II

若要談邏輯, 最重要的邏輯就是:

不准人民公投的中國國民黨政權是獨裁政權

ECFA,  中學生讀經 加重念中國歷史, 核電,  ...都是中國國民黨說了算, 人民完全不能做主.  
台灣是一個人民不能做主的民主國家嗎?

蘋論：鼠貓狗的讀經邏輯2011年 10月03日馬總統在教師節大會上演說時，脫稿倡導讀經。馬辦在競選廣告中也推出「讀經篇」。民進黨給它定性為「文化一中」。
讀經不一定是統派
其實，讀經很好，但要多元的讀，多元社會不能倡導只讀儒家經典；佛、道、西洋經典都該讀。馬提倡讀經放在選前做的政治廣告內，就不能怪別人把它政治化了。文化問題政治化就很荒誕無聊而令人啼笑皆非。
不信？請看以下邏輯：擁護讀經派認為：反讀經等於反孔，反孔等於去中國化，去中國化等於反統，反統等於台獨，台獨等於該死。有些人反馬，但支持讀 經尊孔，所以不能說反馬的一定反孔。也有反孔的支持馬，例如不少中國人受五四及毛的影響反孔，但認為馬是統派所以支持馬。邏輯不能簡化成：反鼠等於支持 貓，反貓等於支持狗；反狗等於支持貓，反貓等於支持鼠。
五四運動打倒孔家店的大將們，若活到今天都支持台獨嗎？胡適說：「在今日妄談讀經，或提倡中小學讀經，都是無知之談，不值得通人一笑。」胡適肯定 是台獨，台獨等於該死，所以胡適該死，胡適的四書五經讀得極好，打著藍旗反藍旗，尤其該死。偉大光榮正確的毛主席也是台獨，因為他批林批孔，搞文革破四 舊，所以也該死。
反讀經派也一樣昏瞶。他們的邏輯是這樣的：擁護讀經等於擁馬，擁馬等於獨尊中華文化，獨尊中華文化等於文化一中，等於統一，統一等於該死。但很多老台灣人以及有些台獨人士漢學修養很深，熟悉四書五經，也愛寫毛筆字送人，能說他們是統派嗎？該死嗎？所有的台灣人都寫漢字、講漢語、使用中國成語和典故，他們都等於統派，都該死，那台灣人豈不死絕了？
文化問題被政治化
四書五經有封建專制、缺乏科學、民主的一面，但也有人文、人道、人本、強調道德精神的一面。不能如綠營所說秦檜、嚴嵩、和珅等奸臣熟讀經書，所以經書有害；也不能如藍營鐵齒所說：「讀經書的孩子不會變壞。」這麼簡單的邏輯藍綠菁英都夾纏不清，讓人哭笑不得。
統派未必主張念古經，獨派未必反對中華文化，如果馬辦沒把讀經與政治選舉夾帶混同，當競選武器，孔老二也不會那麼倒楣，無緣無故又一次被人修理得灰頭土臉了。

中學生應該必修 四書五經 嗎?

請你花 30 秒用下面的表格表達你的想法.
大家的意見在這裡.

馬英九去台灣化的一個實例: 兩張名片

馬英九前:

 

馬英九做了總統後:

沒有是非的台東人

台東達仁鄉長補選 王光清勝出
 
〔記者陳賢義／台東報導〕台東縣達仁鄉長昨天補選，四人角逐，結果由國民黨提名的前鄉長、現任公所秘書王光清以七百五十四票當選。王光清在八十四年任職鄉長期間因涉貪污案，在八十九年被停職，如今重掌公所。
國民黨籍前鄉長包世晶前年鄉長選舉期間，因涉及遷移「幽靈人口」而當選，遭判決當選無效，經縣府解職，選委會依法進行補選作業，四名候選人包括張金生、王光清、前鄉代黃國緯、安朔村幹事葛隆盛。
由於王、張兩人都有執政經驗，加上家族動員，呈現捉對廝殺戰況。開票結果，王光清獲七百五十四票，張金生獲七百廿四票，王以卅票險勝，如願重返公所，並允諾任期會依政見戮力推展。
八十三年從警轉政的王光清，八十四年任職鄉長期間，曾涉及貪污案，八十九年被停職，歷經纏訟十五年，數次判決刑度從五到十年不等，僅更二審判無罪，但更五審法官發現花蓮高分檢早在更二審即逾期上訴，今年五月間判決無罪定讞。